Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note7's 79.5 score. Motorola Edge 50 is a just a little bit heavier cellphone than the Galaxy Note7, but they are equally thin. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better looking display than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit worse 1220 x 2712px resolution and a little lower pixel quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.