Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's global score of 79.5. The Moto G Stylus construction is newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Moto G Stylus counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto G Stylus also has 4 more CPU cores.
Galaxy Note7 has a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size. The Moto G Stylus captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Moto G Stylus also has a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.