Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-08-02 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note7's global score of 79.5. Although the Galaxy A32 is newer than the Galaxy Note7, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a higher number of cores (but slower). Galaxy A32 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy A32 has much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.