Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Galaxy Note7, having a overall score of 91.8 against 79.5. Galaxy A71 5G's design is extremely newer than the Galaxy Note7's, but it's a little bit heavier and a little thicker. The Galaxy Note7 has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels count per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4 more CPU cores and more RAM. Galaxy A71 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much larger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs and a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A71 5G counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 29% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.