Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-08-02 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's score of 79.5. Even though the Galaxy A90 5G is much newer than Samsung Galaxy Note7, it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy Note7 has just a bit better screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy A90 5G has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note7, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note7, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more processing cores.
Galaxy A90 5G has greater battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.