Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. The Galaxy Note7 is a notably older and thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung could make it a lot lighter anyway. Galaxy Note7 features a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser CPU cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a lot larger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much bigger camera sensor, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 63 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.