Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro, getting a 79.5 score against 78.8. Samsung Galaxy Note7's body is just a bit lighter than the vivo X60 Pro, but it's a little thicker and was released 5 years before. Vivo X60 Pro has a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a little bit better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel count per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Vivo X60 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with better video frame rates, a larger back camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a much higher resolution camera.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X60 Pro features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.