Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-15 | -- |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 is just a bit better than the Moto G60s, getting a score of 83 against 79.9. The Galaxy Note8 body is thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto G60s. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note8 has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Moto G60s has Android 11, so it counts with some additional features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 has just a little better processing power than Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note8 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note8 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
Moto G60s has a much greater memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Moto G60s has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 52 percent more battery size.
Motorola Moto G60s shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a F1.7 aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.