Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 has a global score of 83, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note8 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version, so it gives you a couple additional features and performance improvements. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Galaxy Note8 design is much older, just a little heavier and just a little thicker than OPPO Find X3 Pro.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note8, because it has a little higher number of pixels in each inch of screen, a little higher 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a lot better resolution camera, better video frame rates and a lot larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.