Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-15 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 has a general score of 83, which is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 overall score. Although Galaxy Note8 is better than vivo X60 Pro, we must highlight that it is also an a lot older, a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note8 has 9.0 Pie version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
Vivo X60 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note8 counts with a little more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a better pixels amount in each inch of display.
Vivo X60 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a way bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs.
Vivo X60 Pro has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.