Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note9, getting a 92.8 score against 87.1. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro design is incredibly newer, a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note9. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a slightly better display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note9 features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking images in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution camera and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.