Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A41's global score of 81.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 construction is older, thicker and heavier than Galaxy A41. Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy A41, because it has a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution, a bit bigger display and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A41 takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a lot tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A41, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note9 features a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.