Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note9, with a overall score of 90.7 against 87.1. Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note9. Galaxy Note9 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Note9 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 features a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy A52 features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 has a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.