Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Black and Ceramic |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold's score of 79.8. Samsung Galaxy Note9's design is notably lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it's thicker and was released 3 years before. The Galaxy Note9 and the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold feature incredibly similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a quite lower screen density, it also counts with a bigger display and a little higher 1860 x 2480 resolution.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy Note9 features a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.