Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note9, having a general score of 87.9 against 87.1. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy Note9, but it's just a little heavier. The Galaxy Note9 and the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro count with very similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a just a bit lower pixel density and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a processing unit that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Note9 one, both of them have 8 processing cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a much tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality, a much higher 64 MP resolution camera and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.