Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is better than the Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, with a global score of 84.5 against 73.5. The iPhone XS Max design is newer and just a little thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy On Nxt. The iPhone XS Max has a sharper screen than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a little bit higher pixels quantity per inch of display, a bigger display and a higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px.
Galaxy On Nxt counts with a greater memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a better performing processor than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture. Samsung Galaxy On Nxt counts with a little better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.