Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2016-10-24 | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is better than the Galaxy On Nxt's global score of 73.5. Galaxy Note9's body is newer than the Galaxy On Nxt's, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy Note9 features a sharper display than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a better display pixels density.
Galaxy Note9 features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy On Nxt, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a better camera than Galaxy On Nxt, because although it has a worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a way higher video quality. Galaxy Note9 features improved battery duration than Galaxy On Nxt, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.