Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.5 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.60 x 2.84 x 0.33 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Single-Core 1300 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.74 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.9 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 15 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket is slightly better than the Galaxy On5, having a general score of 71.5 against 65.5. Galaxy S III Cricket's design is a little bit thicker but lighter than the Galaxy On5. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy On5, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1280 x 720 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a just a bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy On5, because it has a larger amount of RAM, an additional graphics processing unit and more cores. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy On5, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 64 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket and Galaxy On5 count with quite similar cameras, and although the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a smaller camera aperture, they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same resolution back camera. Samsung Galaxy On5 counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 2600mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S III Cricket is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.