Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-01-09 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 has a score of 85, which is better than the Galaxy On7 Prime's global score of 76.9. Apple iPhone 8 is a just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Galaxy On7 Prime, although they were released only a few months apart. The iPhone 8 counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy On7 Prime, although it has a bit smaller screen, a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels and a quite lower pixel density.
The iPhone 8 features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 8 counts with a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime features a really longer battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The Apple iPhone 8 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light images and video, a bigger sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.