Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-01-09 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy On7 Prime, having a global score of 82.5 against 76.9. The LG V30S ThinQ design is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy On7 Prime, even though both of them were released with only 2 months difference. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has older 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a greater count of pixels per inch of screen, a little larger display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality photos, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a bigger aperture and a more mega-pixels back camera. The LG V30S ThinQ has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG V30S ThinQ's battery life is just as good as Galaxy On7 Prime's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.