Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-01-09 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is slightly better than the Galaxy On7 Prime's general score of 76.9. These phones come with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie version. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is newer than Galaxy On7 Prime's, but it's a little thicker and a bit heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display, a lot better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a larger display. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a larger sensor and a much larger camera aperture.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with superior battery life than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 21% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.