Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2018-01-09 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy On7 Prime, getting a overall score of 77.8 against 76.9. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is much heavier than Galaxy On7 Prime, it's much thinner and also incredibly newer. These phones come with Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy On7 Prime features a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a bit better pixels density and a really bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a much better video resolution, a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.