Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-01-09 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is much better than the Galaxy On7 Prime's 76.9 score. Even being the best device in this comparison, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is just a little heavier and thicker than Galaxy On7 Prime. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a quite larger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2246px and a just a bit more pixels per display inch. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a worse resolution back camera, and they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 21% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.