Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-02 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy On8, having a 77 score against 70.1. Even though the LG V20 and the Samsung Galaxy On8 were released only a couple of months apart, LG V20's body is just a bit heavier but just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy On8. The LG V20 has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy On8, because it has a higher pixel count per inch of display, a little larger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The LG V20 has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy On8, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V20 counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy On8, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with more RAM memory.
The LG V20 captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy On8, because it has a camera with a higher resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations and a much higher (4K) video quality. The Galaxy On8 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than LG V20, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V20 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.