Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the Samsung Galaxy On8, with an 83.7 score against 70.1. The LG V50 ThinQ body is much newer, but just a little thicker and just a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy On8. These phones work with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy On8 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
LG V50 ThinQ has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy On8, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a bigger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy On8, because it has 112 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a quite better processing power than Galaxy On8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy On8, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy On8, because although it has a camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a way bigger aperture.
The LG V50 ThinQ costs a bit more money than Galaxy On8, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.