Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.1 | -- |
| 2013-04-03 | 2016-03-11 |
| 4.13 x 2.28 x 0.46 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.55 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 133 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM21654/G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Single-Core 850 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| VideoCore IV GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 7.2 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is way better than the Galaxy Pocket Neo's global score of 51.6. Galaxy S7's construction is much newer and extremely thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Galaxy Pocket Neo. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a much powerful processor than Galaxy Pocket Neo, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 3 more CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a much better looking screen than Galaxy Pocket Neo, because it has a much higher screen density, a way bigger display and a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy S7 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo, because it has a back-facing camera with way more MP and a way better video resolution.
Galaxy S7 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo, because it has 32 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 200 GB. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S7 is a little more expensive than the Galaxy Pocket Neo, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.