Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 44.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2011-06-01 | 2019-12-27 |
| 4.48 x 2.31 x 0.55 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.58 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 290.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 125 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (14 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.39 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 364 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy Q's 44.5 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A51 is noticeably heavier than Samsung Galaxy Q, it's thinner and also extremely newer. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Q has Android 2.2, so it provides you some additional features.
Galaxy A51 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Q, because it has a lot bigger screen and a way better quantity of pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Q, because it has more cpu cores. Galaxy A51 counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Q.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Q, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much higher resolution back facing camera. Galaxy A51 counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Q, because it has a 167 percent greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A51 is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.