Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Round
SM-G910S| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.95 x 3.13 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Brown | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 370 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is slightly better than Galaxy Round's 73.2 general score. Motorola One Zoom's body is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy Round. Galaxy Round has just a little better performance than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has 4 less cpu cores (although faster) and less RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU.
Samsung Galaxy Round counts with a better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a little smaller screen, a little worse amount of pixels per display inch and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080. Motorola One Zoom features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Round, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 128 GB.
The Motorola One Zoom takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Round, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution. Motorola One Zoom has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Round, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy Round, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy Round. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy Round, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.