Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.95 x 3.13 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Brown | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 370 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Galaxy Round, with a general score of 98.9 against 73.2. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Galaxy Round has Android 4.3, so it provides you lots of additional features. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is way heavier and just a little thicker than Galaxy Round.
Samsung Galaxy Round features a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit inferior pixels quantity in each display inch and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Round, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Round, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Round, because it has a way better 108 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Round, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy Round, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy Round. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy Round, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.