Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.95 x 3.13 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Brown | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 370 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy Round's 73.2 overall score. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a noticeably heavier and thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy Round. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Round has Android 4.3, offering a lot of extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Round, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and more processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy Round features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a quite smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Round, because it has a much more megapixels back facing camera. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Round, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Round, because it has a 79 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy Round, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy Round. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy Round, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.