Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3 | Android 13, 12 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.95 x 3.13 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Brown | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 370 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is way better than the Galaxy Round's global score of 73.2. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is extremely heavier and thicker than Galaxy Round. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Galaxy Round has Android 4.3, providing the user some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Round, because it has a bigger screen, a greater screen density and a much better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Round, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a little better processing power than Galaxy Round, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Round, because it has a 79% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Round, because it has a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy Round, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy Round. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy Round, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.