Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.95 x 3.13 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Brown | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 370 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Round, getting an 81.1 score against 73.2. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a a lot heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy Round. Both devices we are comparing include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the newer 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Round has Android 4.3, providing some nice extra features and better performance.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy Round, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores. Samsung Galaxy Round has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a little smaller display and a bit worse display pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Round, because it has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Round, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Round, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy Round, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy Round. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy Round, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.