Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.1, 4.0 | -- |
| 2012-09-28 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.04 x 2.72 x 0.51 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.60 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is way better than Samsung Galaxy Rugby Pro, having a general score of 79.5 against 63.1. Samsung Galaxy S7 is a way newer and noticeably thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy Rugby Pro, although it's also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy S7 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Rugby Pro, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy S7 has a much sharper display than Galaxy Rugby Pro, because it has a much better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, a larger display and a way higher screen density. The Samsung Galaxy S7 takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Rugby Pro, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera and a lot better video quality.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Rugby Pro, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 200 GB. Galaxy S7 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Rugby Pro, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S7 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.