Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.0.4 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.78 x 2.48 x 0.41 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 768 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 570 hours standby time 12.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than Galaxy S Duos, having a global score of 81.3 against 56.6. LG V35 ThinQ's body is notably thinner but notably heavier than Galaxy S Duos. The LG V35 ThinQ has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S Duos, because it has a way better pixels density, a way bigger screen and a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S Duos, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S Duos, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 60 GB more internal storage capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much better battery duration than Galaxy S Duos, because it has a 120 percent larger battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S Duos, because it has a back facing camera with lot more MP and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than Samsung Galaxy S Duos, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.