Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 2.3.6, 2.3.4 | -- |
| 2011-08-30 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.96 x 2.60 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exnyos C210 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 400 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is way better than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, getting an 80.7 score against 63.7. Even though Google Pixel 3 XL is noticeably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, it's thinner and extremely newer. Google Pixel 3 XL has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has a lot bigger display, a way greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S II AT&T, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 3 XL has a better processing power than Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a much better camera than Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and videos, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.