Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.6, 2.3.4 | -- |
| 2011-08-30 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.96 x 2.60 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Exnyos C210 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 400 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a lot better than Galaxy S II AT&T, with a global score of 83.8 against 63.7. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a extremely newer and thinner device than Galaxy S II AT&T, but it's also extremely heavier. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a slightly better display than Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has a way higher number of pixels per inch of screen, a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a really bigger screen. The Galaxy A50 shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also has a way bigger aperture, a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality photographs and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A50 costs a bit more than Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.