Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-08-28 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.11 x 2.71 x 0.37 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.60 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 305.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 207 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE's overall score of 66. Google Pixel's body is newer and just a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE's, but it is just a little heavier. Google Pixel features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a lot greater count of pixels per screen inch, a way better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a little bit bigger screen. Google Pixel counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a way bigger sensor taking lot better quality photographs and videos, a lot higher video resolution and a much better resolution back facing camera.
The Google Pixel counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Google Pixel features a way better battery duration than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a 2770mAh battery capacity against 1850mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.