Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-08-28 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.11 x 2.71 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.60 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 305.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 207 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 is better than the Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, with a score of 79.1 against 66. The LG V30 body is much newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S II LTE. The LG V30 features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a way higher display density, a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way larger display.
The LG V30 features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V30 has a better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has 6 more cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V30 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a camera with a lot better resolution. LG V30 has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
The LG V30 is a little more expensive than the Galaxy S II LTE, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.