Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 2.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2011-08-28 | 2020-06-12 |
| 5.11 x 2.71 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.60 ounces | 6.68 ounces |
| -- | Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 305.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 207 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Fast is a little bit better than Galaxy S II LTE, getting a score of 72.2 against 66. Although the Moto G Fast is notably heavier than Galaxy S II LTE, it's a little thinner and notably newer. Both phones we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Moto G Fast has 11 version while Galaxy S II LTE has Android 2.3, providing the user some additional features and performance enhancements.
Galaxy S II LTE features a little sharper display than Moto G Fast, although it has a way worse 800 x 480 resolution, a just a little less pixels per inch in the display and a really smaller screen. The Moto G Fast features a superior processor than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has more cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The Moto G Fast counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a bigger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a much more megapixels back facing camera. The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 16 GB more internal storage.
Moto G Fast features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S II LTE, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 1850mAh.
Motorola Moto G Fast is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.