Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| 2013-01-10 | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.27 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM28155 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (400 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| VideoCore-IV GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 350 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than Galaxy S II Plus, having a score of 81.3 against 61.2. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is much heavier than the Galaxy S II Plus, it's thinner and notably newer. The LG V35 ThinQ features a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S II Plus, because it has a greater number of cores and 5 GB more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a way better looking display than Galaxy S II Plus, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880, a lot better amount of pixels per display inch and a really bigger display. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S II Plus, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S II Plus, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a much better resolution back facing camera. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S II Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than the Samsung Galaxy S II Plus, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.