Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Polycarbonate | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a score of 84.5 against 72.2. Even though the iPhone XS Max is way heavier than the Galaxy S III AT&T, it's thinner and incredibly newer. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much better 1242 x 2688 resolution, a better quantity of pixels per display inch and a much bigger screen.
The iPhone XS Max features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. The iPhone XS Max counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory, a higher number of cores and a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone XS Max counts with a better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 51% greater battery size.
IPhone XS Max costs a lot more money than Galaxy S III AT&T, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.