Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Mystic indigo |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a global score of 79.7, which is better than Galaxy S III AT&T's score of 72.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G Stylus has 11 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3. The Motorola Moto G Stylus is a way newer phone than the Galaxy S III AT&T, although it is a bit thicker and a lot heavier.
Moto G Stylus has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720, a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display and a really smaller screen.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a very superior camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way larger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures, a way bigger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a way higher video quality. The Moto G Stylus features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 112 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Moto G Stylus not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.