Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Polycarbonate | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 306 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T works with Android 4.3 operating system. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is noticeably newer, but incredibly heavier and a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T.
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit worse 1280 x 720 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch. Galaxy A32 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 48 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A32 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot higher 48 MP resolution camera in the back, a way bigger aperture for better low light images and video and a much higher video resolution.
Galaxy A32 features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.