Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is way better than Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a 91.8 score against 72.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is way heavier than the Galaxy S III AT&T, it's a bit thinner and also notably newer. Both phones we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3.
Galaxy S III AT&T features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, a lot smaller display and a lot worse 1280 x 720px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a lot larger aperture, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 112 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2100mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A71 5G is also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.