Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android |
| 2012-06-04 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black and White |
| Polycarbonate | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is much better than Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 general score. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's design is newer and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it's also noticeably heavier. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, while Galaxy S III AT&T comes with Android 4.3 OS.
Galaxy A90 5G features a superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, although it has a much lower 1280 x 720px resolution, a way smaller display and a just a bit worse pixels density.
Galaxy A90 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a way higher video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low light environments.
Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.