Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2012-06-04 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black and Gold |
| Polycarbonate | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is better than Galaxy S III AT&T's global score of 72.2. The Galaxy C9 Pro body is extremely newer and way thinner than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, but it is way heavier. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, providing you lots of additional features and better performance.
Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and more cores. The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a little bit better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lot smaller display, a lot lower 1280 x 720 pixels resolution and a just a little worse pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a much larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Galaxy C9 Pro has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 48 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB. Galaxy C9 Pro features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.