Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black and White |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S III AT&T's general score of 72.2. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is much newer and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, but it's a lot heavier. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, giving some additional features and some performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has lesser cpu cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot bigger screen, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, a much bigger camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.