Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 general score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 design is notably newer than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, but it's notably heavier and just a little bit thicker. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a greater display density, a lot better 1080 x 2246px resolution and a larger display. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a lot bigger aperture to take better low light photography, a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 90% more battery size.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.