Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 67.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.0 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-07-13 |
| 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.82 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.72 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Silver |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 295 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is just a bit better than LG Phoenix 5, having a global score of 71.5 against 67.4. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S III Cricket has the previous 4.0 version while LG Phoenix 5 has Android 10. The Galaxy S III Cricket construction has the same thickness than LG Phoenix 5, but it's just a little lighter.
The LG Phoenix 5 counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, and they both have a 2 GB RAM memory, the LG Phoenix 5 also counts with more CPU cores. Galaxy S III Cricket has a brighter screen than LG Phoenix 5, because although it has a little worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
The LG Phoenix 5 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same video resolution and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the LG Phoenix 5 also has a much larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a lot better resolution camera.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than LG Phoenix 5, because it has 32 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 64 GB. LG Phoenix 5 has a much longer battery life than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket costs exactly the same than the LG Phoenix 5, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.