Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 15 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 4.69 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 195.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 306 pixels per inch | -- |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S III, having a score of 79.2 against 74.8. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a notably newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S III, but it's also extremely heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the newer 15 version while Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3, so it provides the user lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
The Samsung Galaxy S III counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 4 lesser cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S III counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much less brightness and a way smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S III, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S III, because it has a lot larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a much better video resolution and a camera with much more MP.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S III, because it has a 124 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.